I like the way the program is developing, and how it keeps pace with user requests for better ux and features. If the program was $1 a year, would 250 times more people buy it? I dunno, I’m not an economist, and I have no idea how that might translate to a digital economy.Įven if it was to be reduced in price, I’m locked in at 250 a year, so I might see no benefit… This is a FANTASTIC piece of software, and I’d love to see it in the hands of more people. But $239 is still a hard pill to swallow for a whole lot of potential users. Not everyone needs to print, but the free version’s 3D exports are unusable for most printing. Maybe $1.99 an export (look at some of the stock photo sites for an example…you might purchase a package of tokens for $49.99 low-res photos might take one token, high res photos might cost two tokens)? How about a $9.99 version that gives you the option to export a certain number of high-poly printable files per month…maybe 5? Or have a lower-price version and allow users to purchase “tokens” for prints. So it’s $29.99 a month unless you pay the annual rate, which technically brings it down to $19.99. Even a $14.99 a month would work better, but the big problem with the $239 rate is that it’s dependent on paying for the whole year, and many hobbyists can’t afford that. Still, there needs to be a plan that works for hobbyists.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |